Brand migration · VFD
Replacing a Siemens VFD part? Cross-reference for VFD is done by engineering review — submit the part number and we map a candidate against your I/O, protocol and application. Candidate replacements, subject to engineering review.
We do not publish a fabricated Siemens VFD mapping table. Typical parts (SINAMICS V20 6SL3210, G120) are matched to a candidate during review — against protocol, footprint and safety scope — before any BOM is confirmed.
No confirmed Siemens VFD cross-reference rows are published yet. Cross-reference for VFD is done by engineering review — submit the part number and we map a candidate against protocol, footprint and safety scope. We will not invent a mapping.
Submit a part number for engineering reviewCandidate replacements, subject to engineering review. Trademarks belong to their respective owners.
The motor nameplate, load description, speed range, start and stop behavior, direction logic, reference source, braking method, and fault-reset philosophy usually remain the core engineering inputs. Existing SINAMICS parameter reports and terminal drawings can be retained as records of intent. They guide the review, but they are not copied into a target drive without reconciling its parameter model and hardware.
Re-engineering covers motor identification, control mode, acceleration and deceleration behavior, current limits, digital and analog terminal logic, braking components, and fault handling. PROFINET or Siemens-specific telegrams must be redesigned around a supported target protocol such as Modbus or CANopen, with PLC words and diagnostics mapped again. Cabinet fit, cooling, EMC measures, upstream protection, and any safety-related stop chain require a fresh check. The retained PLC command sequence must be observed under normal stops, faults, and loss of communications. Parameter backups should be retained for commissioning records and later service review. The final terminal map should remain with the electrical drawings. Any proposed VFD is a candidate replacement — subject to engineering review.
We propose engineering-reviewed candidate replacements for Siemens PLC (Kinco AK / K6), HMI (Kinco GL / F), VFD (Kinco KC / Kemron KV) and servo. These are candidates subject to engineering review against your I/O, protocol and application — not direct-swap equivalents.
No. TIA Portal projects cannot be imported into KincoBuilder. Standard ladder maps roughly 1:1, but Siemens-specific instructions and structured text are rewritten manually — quoted as a managed migration for large programs.
High-performance S7-1500 rack CPUs, integrated fail-safe F-CPUs, and distributed ET 200 architectures have no direct Kinco equivalent. We flag these as manual engineering or not available rather than invent a mapping.
An independent engineering partner mapping Siemens VFD parts to candidate replacements, re-implementing logic and validating fit before commitment.
We are independent of Siemens; no manufacturer appointment or blanket compatibility is claimed. Every proposed product is a candidate replacement — subject to engineering review.
Request engineering review
Reply in 1 business day with candidate mappings — subject to engineering review.
